RAR also supports solid archives, so it can exploit intra-file redundancies. If you're worried the person on the receiving end of the archive won't have a RAR client, you can create a self-extracting executable archive (or SFX) at a minimal cost of about 60 KB additional filesize. It produces much smaller archives in roughly the same time. But you should use it, because RAR, as a compression format, clobbers ZIP. WinRAR fully supports creating and extracting ZIP archives, so choosing WinRAR doesn't mean you'll be forced into using the RAR compression format. It's frequently updated with neat little feature bumps and useful additions two I noticed over the last year were dual-core support and real-time stats while compressing, such as estimated compression ratio and predicted completion time. And WinRAR is very much a living, breathing piece of software. There's a reason WinRAR won the best archive tool roundup at DonationCoder. In contrast, WinRAR is full-featured, powerful, and integrates seamlessly with the shell. I particularly dislike the limited "compressed folder wizard" I get by default in XP and Vista. Sure, ZIP support is built into most operating systems, but the support is rudimentary at best. WinRAR has become increasingly essential to my toolkit over the last year, so this month, I'm buying a WinRAR license. When I wrote Today is "Support Your Favorite Small Software Vendor Day", I made a commitment to spend at least $20 per month supporting my fellow independent software developers.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |